“There’ll be a robot doing my job in fifteen years’ time!” This is my standard (and only half-joking) reply when I get asked about the use of technology in our work at Forvie. After all, the past fifteen years have seen monumental changes in how we work, communicate, live and interact with the world around us, with electronic tech at the centre of it all. And who knows how the world will look in a further fifteen! We’re currently going through the most rapid and dramatic period of technological change since the Industrial Revolution, and life on the Reserve is no exception.

Although my opening line probably sounds a bit flippant, there is more than a ring of truth to it. In my working life, I count birds and their nests: a drone could do that. I survey plants: a drone could do that too. I write reports and newsletters (and blogs, for that matter): AI could do that. I look after the groundskeeping: a robotic mower could do that. I engage with the general public: a chatbot could do that. The list goes on! There’s no doubt that at least some of these examples will become everyday reality in the foreseeable future.

Already, the life of a Reserve warden is unrecognisably different from that of his or her 20th Century counterpart. The laptop and smart phone have become indispensable tools of the trade, alongside the more traditional binoculars, notebook and spade, and all of us – even workaday folk like your author here – need to have some degree of technological savvy. Like any sort of change, this has both positive and negative sides to it.

As a naturalist, having a world of information available at your fingertips – in the literal sense – is a real game-changer. I am a frequent user of Google Lens (other similar programmes may also be available – maybe – I’m really not sure!), which can be very helpful indeed when you’re faced with an unfamiliar plant or insect, for example. Take a quick photo, feed it through Google Lens, and it’ll tell you what species you’re looking at – bingo! However, it’s by no means 100% accurate in its pronouncements, and it often requires a bit of further research on the part of the user in order to arrive at a correct identification. But what it does brilliantly is to point you in the right general direction, thereby saving you a huge amount of time and head-scratching.

I’m also a big fan, by proxy, of the Merlin app for identifying bird sounds (again, other similar things might be available…). I say ‘by proxy’ because I’ve never actually used it myself, having instead learned to ‘speak bird’ through many years of field experience – but I love the fact that it gets folk engaged with bird sounds, and thus with the natural world around them. We’ve observed in previous posts on this blog that nature somehow becomes much more accessible when we start to put names to things. Suddenly that babble of sound resolves itself into a Robin, two Willow Warblers, a Blackcap and a Song Thrush all singing over one another – and a whole new vista opens up to the would-be naturalist.
Like the aforementioned Google Lens, Merlin is far from 100% reliable (like all such programmes – and indeed like human naturalists – it’s still ‘learning’ all the time), and its pronouncements must sometimes be taken with a substantial pinch of salt. But that doesn’t matter: if it’s helping to get folk interested in nature, then it’s 100% positive as far as I’m concerned.

Drones are another piece of 21st Century technology with game-changing possibilities for nature conservation work, particularly when combined with AI (and just to be clear, that’s Artificial Intelligence – when I was a lad, AI meant something different, involving a man from the ministry of agriculture with a long rubber glove). The ongoing study of the Grey Seal haul-out at the mouth of the Ythan Estuary, being undertaken by researcher Claire Stainfield, is a great example.

Claire is using a drone, under licence and in carefully controlled conditions, to systematically photograph the haul-out on a regular basis, then ‘training’ an AI programme to identify and count the seals in the photos. This allows for much greater accuracy than a ‘manual’ count using telescope and clicker, and also captures data on population demographics (i.e. age and sex of each individual seal), which would be impossible using conventional methods. Claire’s work may well go on to set the standard for marine mammal survey in future, and we’re delighted to be able to host her ongoing study here on the Reserve.

Drone and camera technology are advancing all the time, and we have an eye on the future in terms of our seabird monitoring at Forvie. While the tech’s not quite there yet, there may come a time when we can carry out some of our nest censuses by similar methods to those used by Claire for counting the seals. This would clearly be easier for a species that nests entirely in the open (e.g. Sandwich Tern) than one that tends to hide in dense cover (e.g. Eider), though thermal-imaging technology may provide a solution to that particular problem.


Then there is the issue of deciding whether a bird captured on camera is actually sitting on a nest, or just sitting down and having a rest, or whatever. It’s likely that a good deal of ‘ground-truthing’ work would be required – i.e. conventional nest counts carried out by observers on the ground within the colonies, alongside the drone counts, to see how the two compare. And there’d also be the issue of establishing the birds’ own tolerances to the presence of a drone (some species are already known to be averse to drones, and recreational drone use already causes a huge amount of disturbance to nesting, feeding and roosting birds in some places). But if it did work, it could obviate the need to actually enter the colony and put all the birds off their nests, which would be a win all round. Time will tell!

My overwhelming hope, as the meteoric rise of electronic technology continues, is that we as human beings are able to retain our connection with nature. This is where the tech can be a double-edged sword: while we have more information available to us than ever before, we can end up living our lives through an electronic interface rather than experiencing things first-hand. I could almost weep when I see somebody out on the Reserve with headphones on and head bowed, eyes to their phone: you’ve no idea what you’re missing! But as long as we can use technology to enhance our experiences with nature, and not to replace them, all to the good.

One final point to make, and in my own defence too. I realise there’ll be folk reading this who know me reasonably well, who are probably thinking “I can’t believe he’s writing about technology” – fair point, given my fractious relationship with all things electronic. Sure, I remain happier working a spade than a smart phone, and that’ll likely never change. But like every other creature on planet earth, I’ll have to evolve and adapt, or go extinct. Perhaps I’ll book myself some evening classes…








































































































































